Friday, August 28, 2009

Salfrico, To Another Level...



This is my commitment to take my photography to another level of creativity and professionalism. My new site is currently being constructed, to include new packages, prices, and contracts.

Coming This Fall To A Site Near You!! Click the Wedding CritSheet above to view larger...


Bookmark and Share

Newly Weds


My friend Andy was my PA and second gun at Carl & Reneé's wedding. We set up an SB-800 on a light stand to the right with his Honl System snoot, and to the back left we set another SB-800 with a yellow gel and fired it thru an umbrella, to give that warm sunset feel. I think it came out decent... We used PocketWizards to fire the SBs

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Nude & Attitude...

Met up with a friend of mine last night who was willing to let me do figurescapes of her, so I hijacked Lavern's loft again and did a creative session. The model is a nicely toned athlete, and here are a few photos from the session. :D... The shoot was inspired by The Black & White Traveller. Shot with a Nikon D300, a 24 - 85mm lens and one SB-800 Speedlight, triggered by CLS. Other tech info - all shot at ISO200, 1/125sec shutter & f/18 aperture.





Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

The Ten Legal Commandments of Photography


Last week I visited the Art Institute of Charlotte in LakePointe Plaza, North Carolina. On leaving, I walked along the main road running parallel to the plaza, to catch a bus to the Amtrak Station. The photo below is a view of the Photography & Film Departments from the street across the lake. I used my Nokia e71 phone to take this. Then came the cowboy, the Plaza security guard!

With screeching brakes he flew out of his pick up truck and strut over to me and hollered, "Hey you!! Whater you doing thar?!!" He told me it was illegal for me to take any photograph of any building in Charlotte, and I can be arrested for terrorism!!! For all he knew I could be surveying the structural integrity to blow it up!! WTF? I may be new to this country but that's a load of bollocks!! However I apologized and told him I will delete it immediately. Pffft! It got me thinking anyway and I did some research. Much of what I read is summed up in another article I found on http://photojojo.com/content/tips/legal-rights-of-photographers... See below and let me know what you think. Also see http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm and download the PDF.

The Ten Legal Commandments of Photography

I. Anyone in a public place can take pictures of anything they want. Public places include parks, sidewalks, malls, etc. Malls? Yeah. Even though it’s technically private property, being open to the public makes it public space.

II. If you are on public property, you can take pictures of private property. If a building, for example, is visible from the sidewalk, it’s fair game.

III. If you are on private property and are asked not to take pictures, you are obligated to honor that request. This includes posted signs.

IV. Sensitive government buildings (military bases, nuclear facilities) can prohibit photography if it is deemed a threat to national security.

V. People can be photographed if they are in public (without their consent) unless they have secluded themselves and can expect a reasonable degree of privacy. Kids swimming in a fountain? Okay. Somebody entering their PIN at the ATM? Not okay.

VI. The following can almost always be photographed from public places, despite popular opinion:

* accident & fire scenes, criminal activities
* bridges & other infrastructure, transportation facilities (i.e. airports)
* industrial facilities, Superfund sites (an uncontrolled or abandoned place where hazardous waste is located)
* public utilities, residential & commercial buildings
* children, celebrities, law enforcement officers
* UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster, Chuck Norris

VII. Although “security” is often given as the reason somebody doesn’t want you to take photos, it’s rarely valid. Taking a photo of a publicly visible subject does not constitute terrorism, nor does it infringe on a company’s trade secrets.

VIII. If you are challenged, you do not have to explain why you are taking pictures, nor to you have to disclose your identity (except in some cases when questioned by a law enforcement officer.)

IX. Private parties have very limited rights to detain you against your will, and can be subject to legal action if they harass you.

X. If someone tries to confiscate your camera and/or film, you don’t have to give it to them. If they take it by force or threaten you, they can be liable for things like theft and coercion. Even law enforcement officers need a court order.


What To Do If You’re Confronted

* Be respectful and polite. Use good judgment and don’t escalate the situation.
* If the person becomes combative or difficult, think about calling the police.
* Threats, detention, and taking your camera are all grounds for legal or civil actions on your part. Be sure to get the person’s name, employer, and what legal grounds they claim for their actions.
* If you don’t want to involve the authorities, go above the person’s head to their supervisor or their company’s public relations department.
* Call your local TV and radio stations and see if they want to do a story about your civil liberties.
* Put the story on the web yourself if need be.


More Resources

* We’ve condensed these facts a great deal. We recommend downloading The Photographer’s Right and keeping a couple of copies in your camera bag if you’re shooting somewhere you might expect trouble.
* Andrew Kantor has written a good article and a PDF summary of your rights, including some of the ins-and-outs of publishing your pictures.
* The Legal Handbook for Photographers is a great resource covering all aspects of photography and the law.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, June 13, 2009

National Security...?

Taken in Bangkok (October 2008), this soldier stood at attention as I exited the Royal Palace. Only a few days before, Thailand went through political unrest as the Prime Minister was overthrown. I spent those days trapped in a hotel.

Edited in Aperture & Photoshop CS3

Bookmark and Share

Friday, June 12, 2009

On A Train Bound To Charlotte...

Just some random shots as I travelled from Duram to Charlotte for an interview at the Art Institute. A young lady across the way catching up on some work then her breakfast, the host randomly chatting to passengers, stairway to nowhere, the conductor checking tickets, a path on top of the hill at AIC and the all famous mushroom shot hahah!









Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Texture...

In my quest to dig deeper into my creativity, I will be exploring B&W fine art photography for a few blog entries. This is my first installation.
Bookmark and Share

Monday, May 25, 2009

Mr. Screw, Unleashed...

Mr. Screw is one of those elders from the community where I grew up that I will never forget. Today we spent a few minutes taking shots of him, dapper as ever, and to me he looks the same as he did those many years ago, not a day older.




Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 22, 2009

Choices, Choices...


The Alternative 70 - 200mm lineup for Nikon
I have been doing a lot of reading on alternative 70-200mm lenses for my Nikon D300. I came across this Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II, released January 2008. I read the indepth review on www.dpreview.com. It got good ratings, average 8.3 out of 10 on a Nikon camera, versus 8.5 for the upscale Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm F2.8G. The Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro had better reviews about the optics but fell on focusing and speed, it got 8.2. One bad thing is there is no VR on the Sigma, and there is a bit more chromatic aberration at 200mm, where the red and the blue separate than in the Nikon counterpart. One good thing is the Sigma costs $800 USD versus the Nikon's $1,800. Hmmm... Also on B&H users give the Sigma high ratings, and recommend it as the cheaper alternative. The Tamron's street value is $700.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Adjusting in Aperture

I read Scott Kelby's blog post about the "Dave Hill" look using a plugin inside Photoshop (click here). Dave Hill takes the more tedious approach of masking, blending, contrast and sharpening. I will at some point try that as it works with somethings. I shot HQ some weeks ago and did some contrast and sharpening to the photo in Aperture 2.1, and Julian Dadag made reference to Dave Hill then, even tho I didn't know who that was at the time. Thanks for enlightening me Julian!

The photos below are pretty much showing the original photo, and the position of the sliders in Aperture 2. I am a beginner to Lightroom 2 and I am intrigued by the tutorial book by Scott Kelby. I am sure I can achieve great effects in both programs. Anyway tell me what you think... Remember you can click the photos to enlarge for better viewing.

The Original

The Adjustments

The Aperture Adjusted


These images were adjusted in Photoshop CS3 using Topaz Adjust v3 Plug-in. Tell me what you think. you can click the images for larger views...




Bookmark and Share